'If only there was a Turkish Flag' A picture from a Turkish man protesting the 'Kurdish Opening' back in 2009 as something that would split the motherland. |
How does the United States Senate celebrate the Armenian
Genocide? We have an old tradition as unchanging as the Christmas Tree or the
Black Friday shopping death stampede. First, on Genocide Eve, the Committee on
Foreign Relations draws up a bill to recognize April 24th as a day ‘to remember
and observe the anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.’ Then the Turkish media,
government, and civil groups start to sing the age-old Genocide carols to their
American friends. Some of the most popular are ‘The Nature and Scale of the Killings Remain Highly Contentious’, ‘We
Warn You Not to Harm US-Turkish Relations’, and the classic ‘We Didn’t Do It
And If We Did, They Asked For It.’ Then on Genocide Day, the US Senate refuses
to hear the resolution in the general assembly and it goes absolutely nowhere.
So I am going to
tell you guys a Genocide story that I stumbled on in my various researches and
through my accidental membership in the Turkish Coalition of America—a charity
organization made up of Turks and Turkish descendants living in America. (I
started getting emails from them when I moved to Istanbul) I think this story
nicely illustrates the nature of the whole Genocide issue.
The TCA does a lot of noble work. A quick perusal of their
latest newsletter includes scholarships, an aid package for the victims of the
Typhoon Haiyan in the Phillipines, a cultural exchange with Canadian youths and
a commemoration ceremony celebrating the ties between Turkey and the Native
American community.
What ties you may ask?
Well the TCA has been lobbying for the American Indians for
quite some time now. (Let me say now that I’m not all that sure that ‘Indian’
is the preferred term. I read in an interview with a Lakota that it was the word
aboriginals preferred and have seen the term in the speeches of firebrand
Russell Means, so I’m running with it.) Most recently they helped organize the
government of Turkey’s funding of a water tower for the Warm Springs Tribe in
Oregon. Turkey donated over 200,000 dollars. The TCA had a competition among
American Indian Tribes for the grant in 2012. The grant was announced in a
newsletter regularly distributed to the tribes and Warm Springs won the bid. (Let
that sink in, Turkish lobbying groups have a regular newsletter for the
Indians) This was back in October, right after Erdoğan had spent several months
gassing and attacking hundreds of thousands of people protesting him in the streets
and was presented to us by the press here in Turkey as evidence of how great Turkey
had become. Now America’s poor and downtrodden came to Ankara for help, not to Washington.
The Warm Springs tribe was a little baffled, but grateful of
course. And I’m glad they got their water tower. They deserved it and I’m sure
the other 31 applications that didn’t win were deserving as well. Still, everyone
was trying to figure out why a government halfway around the world busy
secretly funding Al Nusra radicals in the Syrian Civil War while at the same
time sending phalanxes of police against its own citizens in the greatest
demonstration of civil unrest in its history was fussing over a small Oregon
tribe. Turkish officials cited ‘the historical and cultural connections between
Turkey and Native Americans.’
The TCA has been trying also to sponsor a bill for economic development on Indian lands. Great! If passed, the bill would
enable tribal governments to approve development projects sponsored by foreign
investors without the approval of the Federal government through the Bureau of
Indian Affairs. This is apparently a very time consuming process, full of red
tape, which helps cripple tribal economies. Great again. Sounds like a stupid
requirement anyway, left over from the bad old days—or rather, the worse old
days. I doubt any American Indian would ever say the bad old days are over. But
as it turns out, the bill mainly favors one country and one source of foreign
investor-Turkey!
Turkey and the TCA also grant scholarships to American
Indians. They fly officials to Turkey for economic conferences and they attend
native conferences in the States as well. In 2010, an official from the Turkish
Trade Ministry became the first foreign official to speak at the annual
conference in Las Vegas on tribal economic development. In the same year, Turkey
brought members of the Coeur D’Alene tribe to Ankara. Alaskan Representative
Don Young, a strong supporter of his state’s tribes said Turkey was “the first
foreign country that has shown interest in investing with — cooperation with —
a tribe to improve their economic lot.” All this official attention and show of
respect must feel like a vindication for a people whose history is filled with
diplomatic betrayals, political marginalization, and broken treaties.
So why all this fuss? Why all this effort to support a
trampled minority in another country-a minority who more than deserve the
support, by the way. Which is kind of the crux point of the issue here. Turkey
has chosen a target that no one would ever, in their right mind, argue against.
The moral soundness of trying to help American tribes build sustainable
economies is unassailable. And when, say, Armenian-American lobbyist argue
against the bill, they look like assholes.
Here is what TCA president, Lincoln McCurdy
has to say about the motivation on the TCA’s own website:
"It
definitely broadens (Turkey's) political base and it increases the opportunity
for Turkish companies to establish operations in this country. A broader
political base, in turn, could aid Turkey in recurring Capitol Hill conflicts
with Armenian-Americans. In raw population, Armenian-Americans widely outnumber
Turkish-Americans. Turkey, though, enjoys considerable high-level clout as an
important NATO country. Nearly every year, these competing forces are on
display as lawmakers press for an Armenian genocide resolution that takes note
of the massacres that took place during the Ottoman Empire's dying days. The
resolution routinely fails but keeps coming back; this year's version has 84
House co-sponsors. It's in this context that the Native American investment
bill reflects Turkey's cultivation of tribes."
Holy shit! Did he actually write
and post that? The main reason we are offering help to a people who have
suffered perhaps more, or at least longer, than any other in the world is to
build our numbers against the annual Armenian Genocide bill? To drown out the
Armenian lobby? First, if I have any American Indian readers at this point, I
would love to know what you think on this issue. My advice for you guys would
be take the money and run. In my limited experience with American Indians they
are too politically canny to be fooled by any of the ideological hocus pocus (been there done that), and
practically speaking, the TCA is pursuing a policy that makes sense for the
welfare of the tribes and that other countries should follow. And it’s such a
shame that this historical and herculean effort is being put forth in the name
of genocide denial.
And here is where the issue gets
more complicated, because one of the classic denial arguments is “Well, you
Americans committed genocide against the Kızılderililer (That’s the Turkish
word for Indian and it means ‘Redskins’—yep, that’s right.) So you have no room
to talk.” The rather extremist website tallarmeniantale (which pops up in any search on the Genocide, so it’s not so marginal) devotes
an entire section to the subject—going as far to suggest that the white
genocide of American Indians was attempted by Europeans on ‘the Turk’, their
racial brothers. You see pictures of Indian chiefs everywhere in Turkey—in leftist
cafes and in the windows of vans and minibusses. Everyone feels both a racial
connection as a people with ancestors in Cenral Asia (which they should then
feel toward every Asian except maybe the Chinese) and also a political one, as
the abused victims of European Imperialism.
This argument is a tacit
admission, of course—‘You did it, too!’ they say, but the ‘too’ implies that we
did it as well. And it’s always curious that someone would try to clear their
name by connecting it to one of the largest massacres of a people in human
history. And never mind that Turkey, far from being a hapless victim, was a
large empire—and that the Sunni Turks hold the reins of power over minorities
who have been here a lot longer than they have, minorities who continue to be
driven out and marginalized; a little bit like European descendants hold the
reins of power over a minority that have been in the Americas a lot longer than
we have. But Turkey has a compulsion to constantly identify itself with the
victims, which is why Erdoğan, in command of the military and police, can
mastermind an attack on protesters in Turkey’s 80 cities and still feel that he
is the underdog. The psychology of victimhood is extremely dangerous here—it’s
what justified the Genocide in the minds of the Ottomans in the first place and
still forms the core of denial arguments.
And so what of this assertion
that white Americans committed genocide. Does anyone deny it? Article II from the Convention for the Punishment and Prevention of Genocide says:
“Genocide means any of the following acts
committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical,
racial or religious group, as such:
(a)
Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
At some point over the last five hundred years, the conquerors of the
Americas have done all of these things to one or more Indian nations. By international law, it certainly
classifies as a genocide. I never saw the word in a school history book,
though, so out of curiosity I googled 'American Indian Genocide.' (I am not a scholar so that is my
research method—sorry) and one of the first articles to pop up was this one by GuentherLewy. He
methodically makes the case that the deaths of millions upon millions of Native
Americans was not a genocide. So we do genocide denial too! But what is Mr.
Lewy’s connection to Turkey? Well, he also is one of the American deniers of the
Armenian Genocide and a scholar that Turkey loves
to drag out as proof it did nothing wrong (but if we did, so did you!). Mr.
Lewy’s purpose seems to be to defend the Jewish Holocaust’s status as the most
important genocide in history, if not the only one. Somehow The Holocaust’s
exclusive right to the term ‘genocide’ is important to a large number of
people.
Another Google search on Turkey’s aid to the American Indians turns up
articles in fanatically anti-Muslim websites such as Jihadwatch, the Counter Jihad Report or this one. They make some of the same points I do about Turkey's motivations but for horrible reasons. So some of the most vocal
groups keeping up with and speaking out against this issue are racist
themselves determined to prove the innate violence and danger of Islam.
And so we have the full immoral picture.
Here you have the wealth of entire country and the efforts of a major
lobbying group in the US devoted to helping a group that has suffered much at
the hands of various oppressors throughout history. And the help they provide
is logical and long overdue. But their aims in doing so are horrifyingly
cynical—to secure support in covering up another one of the greatest crimes in
history. Think about that a second—you are devoting millions of dollars and
hundreds of hours to getting one oppressed group to aid in the oppression of
another. Some of the people who oppose this are wildly racist themselves (the
jihadwatch type) and their main motivation is hatred and fear of Muslims—which of
course supports the Turks assertion that they are the victims of white racism
because sometimes they actually are. Another contingent who is helping Turkey
deny the genocide is also denying the genocide of the people Turkey is trying
to use in its own denial—all in the name of justice to another genocide which
they believe only retains it’s legitimacy if it remains the only one.
Turkey’s motivations for targeting the Indians is multifold I think. On the
one hand, they have picked a cause which justifiably blackens the American name
and in doing so, teach a very expensive lesson to the United States. “See? This
is what it feels like when one country meddles in another country’s affairs in
the name of human rights.” (The theme of the genocide issue being merely a case
of the West meddling in Turkey’s internal affairs is a common one). Politically
speaking, if numbers of supporters was their sole goal then they probably
should have gone after a group with more clout. Second, they somehow build a
sense of moral superiority at a time when their moral clout is going down the
toilet."We aren’t oppressing anyone! We have gone into the very den of the
oppressor and helped liberate a people." Maybe that explains the timing of the
Warm Springs announcement. And third, as was evident from the newspaper
coverage of the same Warm Springs grant last year, it’s a tremendous boost to
nationalist pride to be the one country capable of supporting a poor minority which
not even the once great United States can manage to help. Turkey sends monetary
aid to the US—what a propaganda coup! And then there is this perceived racial
brotherhood—which infuriates me the most—the belief in race being the root of
all this evil in the first place, all coupled with the false belief in a mutual
victimhood.
This whole thing stands as a sad example of how historical denial twists
and corrupts everything it touches. The TCA is doing a good deed but its
motivations stink up the whole thing and corrupts both the justice to the American
Indian which was long overdo and the good intentions of those behind the good deed. Turks, as a culture, seem very hospitable, empathetic, sensitive and possessors of a conscience that allows them to sympathize and grieve for, say, the recent deaths on the South Korean ferry in a way that I have not seen another nationality do. And yet this race issue, this nationalism problem fouls it all up. It holds them back as a nation. (And as a man coming out of the South I know what it's like to have a racist culture hold back the progress of your homeland)
It somehow reminds me of a professor of history I
heard about recently—who has devoted his entire life to trying to prove that
the Ottoman Armenian Balyan family or architects did not in fact build any of
the buildings they are credited with. What an incredibly tragic waste of a
brain, of a life, of thousands upon thousands of hours of research. He could be
devoting himself to something that might actually help his country, but no,
instead all that effort is bent upon an absurd racist denial of history.
Even as I write—Haberturk promises a ‘historical’ announcement from the
Prime Minister’s office on the Armenian incident of 1915. We are still waiting
to hear what Erdoğan will say. It was published on the PM's website at least--an offer to share the grief of those massacred in 1915. An unprecedented step by the Turkish state run by a man so intolerant that all opposition is swiftly crushed. In any case, on April 24th, may all the world’s
butchered and martyred and downtrodden rest in peace. This year is the 99th
anniversary.
No comments:
Post a Comment